 |
 |
 |
|
Carmela Lutmar New York University
[Editor's Note: Originally prepared for the second edition of Principles of International Politics]
I present the following statement to the
class:
"If states were truly rational, war would
never occur. I ask them to think about it and discuss it. The discussion
usually raises issues of the real meaning of
rationality, and whether it refers to acting
upon specific preferences or emphasizing outcomes. Moreover, we all know that
war is bad (casualties, rationing of resources, and so on). Does
this mean that leaders who go to war are irrational? I ask the students to
think of the possibility or cases in which going to war is the rational action
to take.
Another example I use to provoke
discussion on rationality is to talk about Iraq and Saddam Hussein. I ask
students if they think Saddam Hussein is a rational leader. The various answers
usually lead to the concept of rationality as advocated in Principles.
This might also lead to discussion about perceptions, but thats a
different story
if one wants to pursue that path (and relate it to
rationality), one can go back to the Gulf War (1991), and talk about how
perceptions about others preferences might lead to different actions
(Saddam Hussein misperceiving the U.S.s reaction to his invasion of
Kuwait).
|